A clearer view of digital assets
From domain names to Bitcoin, Solana, and AI. Find the questions, evidence, and frameworks to understand what you’re really looking at.
13 screening topics · 10 in-depth guides · One evidence-first approach
01 / Choose your lens
A digital asset screener is a starting point for research. Choose the framework that matches the asset and the decision in front of you.
Start with a repeatable framework for ownership, evidence, costs, and risk.
Explore the framework02 / SCREENING GUIDEReview registration, transfer conditions, naming fit, and renewal costs.
Explore the framework03 / SCREENING GUIDEConnect verified traffic and revenue to the work a website needs.
Explore the framework04 / SCREENING GUIDEInspect search history, content relevance, and backlink context.
Explore the framework05 / SCREENING GUIDEUnderstand custody, execution costs, and usable market liquidity.
Explore the framework06 / SCREENING GUIDEInspect the mint, permissions, token supply, and trading venues.
Explore the framework07 / SCREENING GUIDESeparate the token from its media, permissions, and promised benefits.
Explore the framework08 / SCREENING GUIDETrace contract permissions, dependencies, and application control.
Explore the framework09 / SCREENING GUIDEFollow the connection between a token and its underlying claim.
Explore the framework10 / SCREENING GUIDEMap shared dependencies, concentration, and routes to exit.
Explore the framework11 / SCREENING GUIDECheck whether an AI workflow is useful, repeatable, and economical.
Explore the framework12 / SCREENING GUIDECompare models against the same task, evidence, and review standard.
Explore the framework13 / SCREENING GUIDETurn prompt ideas into versioned, testable working instructions.
Explore the framework02 / Domains, websites & SEO
A good-looking domain or a growing traffic chart is the start of a review. Trace ownership, inspect the operating record, and work out which assets and accounts are actually included.
03 / Bitcoin, Solana, NFTs & Web3
Start with the exact network and asset identifier. Then review permissions, custody, liquidity, and the evidence behind any promised utility. The same ticker can conceal very different questions.
04 / AI, LLMs & prompts
Evaluate AI workflows against the work they need to do. Keep inputs, model settings, prompt versions, errors, and review effort together so that a compelling demonstration can become an inspectable result.
05 / A method you can repeat
Use the same structure across your research, while keeping the checks specific to each asset class.
Name the asset, your intended use, and the conditions that must be true before a deeper comparison makes sense.
Record sources, timestamps, permissions, costs, and gaps. Keep a claim separate from the material used to verify it.
Ask who or what needs to keep working: custodians, platforms, contracts, customers, data sources, or model providers.
Document what passed, what remains unknown, and what evidence would change the decision. Revisit the record when conditions change.
A screening result is a record of the available evidence. It does not establish value, predict returns, or remove the need for deeper professional review where appropriate.
Explore the method06 / Digital Asset Screener Lab
A persuasive demo is the beginning of an AI review. Define the task, build representative tests, compare outputs without brand labels, track failures and costs, and preserve enough detail to understand what changed between evaluations.
Read the guide: A Practical Evaluation Workflow for AI, LLMs, and PromptsDifferent asset names can conceal the same underlying dependencies. Build an exposure map that connects holdings to custody, counterparties, markets, revenue sources, and operating costs, then use simple scenarios to identify what needs closer review.
Read the guide: Build a Digital Asset Portfolio Exposure MapAn NFT can connect a token, a media reference, and a promised experience without making them the same asset. Use a structured rights and dependency review to establish what is documented, controllable, transferable, and still uncertain.
Read the guide: NFT and Web3 Due Diligence: What the Token Actually Gives YouA real-world asset token needs a documented connection to something beyond its ledger entry. Follow the claim from token to underlying asset, identify the responsible parties, and test how reconciliation, payments, redemption, and exceptions are supposed to work.
Read the guide: RWA Token Screening: Connect the Token to the Underlying ClaimA token's name and price chart reveal little about its controls. Build a Solana screening record that connects the correct mint to supply permissions, concentration, liquidity, and the evidence needed to resolve uncertain findings.
Read the guide: Solana Token Screening: Mint Authorities, Supply, and LiquidityA domain’s search history needs context before it can support an acquisition case. Review historical uses, inspect backlink samples, separate observations from penalty assumptions, and test whether the planned project works without promised search benefits.
Read the guide: How to Screen a Domain’s SEO History and Backlink RiskA website acquisition needs three connected reviews: audience evidence, earnings evidence, and the work required to keep operating. Learn how to reconcile the records, identify dependencies, and make the transition assumptions visible before discussing value.
Read the guide: Website Acquisition Screening: Verify Traffic, Revenue, and WorkloadScreen the full Bitcoin route, from the trading venue to the intended custody arrangement and eventual exit. This checklist makes liquidity assumptions, execution costs, recovery responsibilities, and withdrawal conditions explicit without relying on price forecasts.
Read the guide: Bitcoin Screening: Liquidity, Custody, and Execution CostsA memorable domain still needs a practical acquisition review. This checklist separates control, transfer mechanics, recurring costs, brand questions, and historical use so a buyer can identify unresolved conditions before discussing final terms.
Read the guide: Domain Name Due Diligence: A Buyer’s Screening ChecklistA useful screen starts with a decision and a record of what is actually known. Learn how to separate access requirements, evidence gaps, and economic risks before a domain, website, token, or other asset reaches your shortlist.
Read the guide: How to Screen a Digital Asset Before You Compare It07 / A few useful answers
Understand the scope of a screen before you rely on its result.
It is a structured way to narrow a research question. Start by identifying an asset and checking the evidence relevant to its ownership, utility, costs, and dependencies. Our topic pages provide educational frameworks you can apply to your own records.
The site publishes screening frameworks and research guides. It does not provide live market feeds, connect to wallets, execute trades, or generate personalized investment recommendations.
They can share a process for identifying the asset, gathering evidence, and recording uncertainty. Their actual checks differ: a domain needs a transfer and registration review, while a prompt needs versioned instructions and representative task evaluations.
Keep the gap in the record. Note the claim, the source, and what would resolve the uncertainty. An unanswered question may justify a narrower scope, further investigation, or stopping the comparison; it should not quietly become a positive result.
Begin with the digital asset screening method, then choose one asset class. Read the relevant Lab guide and create a short evidence record before adding more candidates or more complex comparisons.
Each Lab article includes one primary-source reference that supports its subject. Publication dates appear beside the articles. Corrections and source concerns can be sent to the contact email listed on the Contact page.
Questions worth asking
Explore a new asset class or suggest a topic for the Lab.
